To Whom It May Concern,
I read with dismay the post at : http://www.biffyclyro.com/news,biffy-clyro-tour-photographers_1775.htm where you are offering fans and “budding photographers” the chance to shoot the band from the photo pit and have their photos “featured” (“exploited”?) on the bands website and socials.
It is incredibly disappointing – not that you are offering the chance to ‘budding photographers’ – we all have to start somewhere, and this is a great opportunity for someone who is interested in becoming a professional concert photographer, but because of a number of reasons…
1. Professional freelance or agency photographers are not allowed to shoot this tour.. This prevents people like me from earning a living, syndicating images to editorial outlets like regional and national newspapers via editorial agencies, or directly.
It’s fair enough that the band are of course entitled to allow or restrict access to whoever they choose – but it’s a kick in the face when concert photography as a career already has the coffin lid closed, and actions like this are the final nail…
2. What is the point of encouraging ‘budding photographers’ to shoot the band’s show on one hand when the door to a possible career is being shut in their face with the other hand, unless it is purely to exploit their work free of charge? Why not hire a professional? Naturally, budding photographers are more likely to allow free and unrestricted use of their images without even considering the fact they SHOULD be getting paid for their work. This willingness to work for the thrill of getting their photos published (without pay) makes it even harder for professional music photographers to license their work.
There will come a point when the art of concert photography is lost, and the days of high quality imagery that adds value to YOUR BRAND will be long gone – replaced with cheap but meaningless snapshots of the artists unflattering gurning, microphones where their noses should be, and awkward looking poses with badly composed photographs that are unusable and unsuitable as quality editorial content to help increase page space in features and articles. Professional photographers don’t just know when to click the shutter to capture iconic moments – they will know when NOT to press it, and what NOT to publish.
3. Fans in the pit… Are they insured? Do they know how to behave? The pit is not a ‘photographer’ pit.. it’s a working environment where stewards and security also work, to ensure the safety of the crowd. Professional photographers (should) know how to react in event of any emergency or any problems. A fan is more likely to get in the way, cause an obstruction, or even stand there taking photos of someone being taken ill and being pulled over the barrier to be treated.
4. You ask for examples of the photographers work.. So, clearly there is an expectation of quality work. Can you be clear on what rights the photographers will retain? Will you be forcing them to assign all rights to the band? Will they be free to syndicate their images? Will they understand or adhere to “editorial use only”?
Freelance photographers are not parasites. We are struggling to earn a living as it is, with newspapers making staff photographers redundant and having to rely on freelancers supplying them images – which we can’t supply when we are prevented access to the shows.
PR companies are paid to help generate maximum exposure and coverage in the press, and to an extent keep things OUT of the press. Professional photographers are part of that machine.. Those clippings that your PR company keeps to show the value of their services to you – they contain our work.. when a picture is used, it massively increases the space on the page that would otherwise just contain a paragraph of text and, and the number of eyes that read the accompanying article/review is therefore greatly increased.
While it may not be the intention of your offer, the consequences of it are far reaching. Please do give them consideration.
With kind regards,